InDEPTH Annual Survey – Final Results, January 2026
- What kind of in-depth content would you MOST like InDEPTH to produce more of? (please select ONE)
- Deep analysis of incident reports and lessons learned: 42.2%
- Training and performance science: 17.5%
- Diver psychology and human factors: 15.7%
- Gear testing and engineering breakdowns: 11.9%
- Profiles of cutting-edge exploration teams: 11.7%
- Other: 1%
- Which format would you MOST like InDEPTH to expand into for technical diving features? (please select ONE)
- Downloadable white papers or data sets: 34.8%
- Technical brief podcasts: 21.6%
- Interactive dive site maps or 3D visualizations: 16.7%
- Long-form video documentaries: 13.7%
- Virtual roundtables with experts: 12.7%
- Other: 0.5%
- How well do you feel InDEPTH currently represent the global technical diving community?
- Very well: 48.0%
- Somewhat well: 24.5%
- Neutral: 17.6%
- Needs improvement — more diverse perspectives: 5.0%
- Needs improvement — more regional coverage: 4.9%
- If InDEPTH could create a recurring “series,” what theme would excite you MOST? (please select ONE)
- “Beyond Training” (performance, resilience, psychology): 26.5%
- “Diving Disasters Revisited” (case studies): 24.5%
- “Frontiers” (active exploration missions): 18.6%
- “Inside the Dive Lab” (gear, testing, innovation): 16.7%
- “Voices from the Deep” (interviews & profiles): 12.7%
- Would you be interested in exclusive member content (e.g., early access, behind-the-scenes interviews, or training insights) for paid members?
- Yes, absolutely: 7.8%
- Possibly, depending on cost/value: 28.4%
- No, I prefer open-access content: 63.8%
- If InDEPTH launched a collaborative “Tech” video or live-stream series, which approach would you prefer? (please select one)
- Research & decompression science updates: 43.8%
- Case-study debriefs from actual incidents: 21.1%
- Panel discussions with elite instructors and explorers: 19.9%
- Equipment tech deep-dives: 9.2%
- Open Q&A sessions with audience participation: 6.0%
- How do you currently feel about the balance between editorial depth and readability in InDEPTH articles?
- Perfect balance: 38.6%
- Could use more depth and data: 20.8%
- Could use shorter, more digestible formats: 8.9%
- Varies by author or topic: 31.7%
- What additional interactive or digital tools would make InDEPTH’s online experience more valuable for you? (select all that apply)
- Interactive decompression profiles or risk models: 39.7%
- Article-linked dive data visualizations: 38.8%
- Training progression charts or planning tools: 32.1%
- Reader comment threads or expert responses: 22.0%
- Integration with dive log software/apps: 6.1%
- Please select the certification courses you have completed (select all that apply):
- Certified scuba diver: 88.4%
- Certified scientific diver: 14.7%
- Certified cave diver: 41.5%
- Certified rebreather diver: 55.2%
- Certified sidemount diver: 50.9%
- Certified tech diver (excl. cave, rebreather & sidemount): 73.6%
- Certified freediver: 17.5%
- Competitive freediver: 1.8%
- Are you a dive professional (e.g., instructor, instructor trainer, staff of a diving vendor or service provider)?
- Yes: 52.4%
- No: 47.6%
- [ANSWERED ONLY BY DIVE PROFESSIONALS] Please select all dive professional ratings or descriptions that apply to you.
- Freediving instructor or I.T.: 6.7%
- Recreational scuba instructor or I.T.: 87.9%
- Cave diving instructor or I.T.: 18.8%
- Rebreather diving instructor or I.T.: 30.1%
- Sidemount diving instructor or I.T.: 34.0%
- Tech diving instructor or I.T. (excl. cave, rebreather & sidemount): 56.8%
- Public safety diving instructor or I.T.: 10.1%
- Scientific diving instructor or I.T.: 14.3%
- Work for a diving vendor or service provider: 26.9%
- How long ago was your first dive?
- Less than 5 years: 9.7%
- 5 to 10 years: 12.6%
- More than 10 years: 77.7%
- Approximately how many scuba dives have you done so far in your life?
- Average: 2,564
- Average: 2,564
- What is your relation to GUE (dive training agency)?
- I’ve never taken a GUE course & I’m not interested in taking one: 38.9%
- I’ve never taken a GUE course & I’m interested in taking one: 30.1%
- I’ve taken one or more GUE courses: 22.0%
- I am a GUE member: 9.0%
- Please select the group that includes your year of birth.
- 1901-1927 (The Greatest Generation): 0.0%
- 1928-1945 (The Silent Generation): 1.9%
- 1946-1954 (Boomers I): 8.7%
- 1955-1964 (Boomers II/Generation Jones): 21.4%
- 1965-1980 (Generation X): 36.9%
- 1981-1996 (Millennials): 26.2%
- 1997-2012 (Generation Z): 4.9%
- In which region is your country of residence?
- United States (including AK & HI): 36.2%
- Western Europe: 30.4%
- Canada: 8.8%
- Australia, New Zealand: 7.8%
- Eastern Europe (including Russia): 4.0%
- Mexico, Central America, Caribbean, Tropical Atlantic: 3.9%
- Middle East (excluding Egypt): 3.9%
- Africa, Madagascar: 2.0%
- South Pacific, Indo-Pacific, Other Tropical Asia-Pacific Region (incl. Maldives): 1.1%
- South America: 1.0%
- China, Hong Kong, Macau: 0.9%
- Japan, Other Non-Tropical Asia-Pacific Region: 0.0%
- Egypt: 0.0%
- To which gender do you most identify?
- Female: 14.1%
- Male: 85.4%
- Non-binary / Other / Unsure / Prefer Not To Say: 0.5%
206 respondents
Please participate in our other dive industry surveys & market studies.
Thank you for your contribution to a better understanding of the dive industry for everyone’s benefit. You’re awesome! Dive safe!